| Home | Gallery | Field Guide | Diving | Journals | Sponsors/Thank Yous |

Gigantism........ Why do some Antarctic marine
invertebrates seem to be unusually large compared to related species
elsewhere?Shown here is a crustacean, the giant Antarctic isopod Glyptonotus antarcticus. Only those Antarctic benthic invertebrates whose growth is not hampered by calcium deficiency seem to reach a large size [1]. Those using little calcium are arenaceous foraminifera, crustaceans, and tubicolous polychaete worms; those not using calcium are hydroids, nudibranchs, ascidians, and many polychaete worms [1].
Why is calcium an issue? It is difficult to precipitate calcium carbonate at
low temperatures and as a result, Antarctic calcareous (calcium-using)
invertebrates like molluscs, echinoderms, and bryozoans are usually very fragile
[1]. Extracting calcium carbonate for shell building and
maintenance requires more energy than in warmer waters [8].
Antarctic invertebrate animal groups that are physically
small include calcareous foraminifera, prosobranch gastropods (have calcareous
shells), bivalves (have calcareous shells), scaphopods, and brachiopods (have
calcareous shells) [1]. When an organism in very cold
water isn't hampered by a need for calcium, gigantism can be a consequence of a
slow rate of development and growth [1]. Biochemical
processes relating to growth are influenced by temperature; slower growth occurs
in colder water and sexual maturity is somewhat delayed, with a resulting larger
adult body size [1,7].

Here is
a pile-up of the proboscis worm Parborlasia corrugatus, which grows up
to two meters in length; it is chemically defended by an acidic mucus (pH 3.5) which
potential predators avoid [2,4].
When an organism in
very cold water isn't hampered by a need for calcium, gigantism can be a
consequence of low predation pressure --- when predation and competition for
food within one's own species are low, organisms grow to a larger size, and to
an older age [1,7,8].

This
siliceous hexactinellid sponge Scolymastra joubini can be up to two
meters high and 1.4 meters in diameter [5].
When an
organism in very cold water isn't hampered by a need for calcium, gigantism can
be a consequence of a high abundance of available silica --- siliceous organisms
like radiolarians, hexactinellid sponges, and diatoms can reach large sizes
because the availability of silica is not a limiting factor in Antarctic waters
[1].
Here is the inside of the volcano sponge Scolymastra joubini
(which, as mentioned above, can be up to two meters high and 1.4
meters in diameter) [5].
As shown here, a
cold-water animal can increase its body size by constructing a silica lattice
skeleton occupying a large volume; this huge lattice skeleton could not be
constructed with calcium carbonate in cold water due to the calcium
precipitation problem [3].
Here is the sea spider or pycnogonid Colossendeis australis.
This sea spider shows how an animal can increase its body size with little
building effort simply by elongating its appendages; it occupies a large amount
of space with very little body mass [3].
This serolid isopod illustrates how body size can be increased by
flattening to occupy more two-dimensional space; flattening helps an organism
minimize sinking into a fine-grained soft bottom on which it may live [3].
This giant arborescent agglutinated foraminiferan Notodendrodes
antarctikos stands up to 3.8 centimeters high -- remarkably large for a
unicellular organism [6].
Relatively large body size can be gained by
using prefabricated building blocks, as in the sediment grains glued together by
this foraminiferan Notodendrodes antarctikos [3].
1: Adaptations within Antarctic
Ecosystems, Proceedings of the Third SCAR Symposium on Antarctic Biology. GA
Llano, ed. Washington DC : Smithsonian Institution, 1977. pp. 135-157; 2:
Biology of the Antarctic Seas XIV, Antarctic Research Series 39(4):289-316,
1983; 3: The Environment of the Deep Sea, Rubey Volume II. WG Ernst & JG
Morin, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1982. pp. 324-356; 4:
Journal of Experimental Marine biology and Ecology 153(1):15-25, 1991; 5:
Ecological Monographs 44(1):105-128, 1974; 6: Zoological Journal of
the Linnean Society 69(3):205-224, 1980; 7: Adaptations within Antarctic
Ecosystems : Proceedings of the Third SCAR Symposium on Antarctic Biology.
GA Llano, ed. Washington : Smithsonian Institution ; Houston, Tex. :
distributed by Gulf Pub. Co., 1977. pp. 327- 334; 8: The Biology of the
Southern Ocean. GA Knox. New York : Cambridge University Press, 1994.
pp.193-220
| Text ©Peter Brueggeman. Photographs
©Norbert Wu, Jim Mastro, Robert Sanders (Sam Bowser/S043
archives), & Canadian Museum of Nature (Kathleen Conlan). Photographs may not be
used in any form without the express written permission of Norbert Wu, Jim
Mastro, Robert Sanders (Sam Bowser/S043 archives), or Canadian Museum of Nature
(Kathleen Conlan).
Norbert Wu no longer grants permission for uncompensated use of his photos under any circumstances whatsoever;
want more info?
|