January 1997 postings on McMurdo regulator testing
to Techdiver newgroup


From: [email addresss deleted] (ROBBINS, ROB)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:14 NZD
To: [email addresss deleted]
Subject: Antarctic Regs

Here is a chart of regulator performance from tests conducted by US
Antarctic Program from '89 thru '95.  The data was accumulated by
Jeff Bozanic and Jim Mastro.

All dives were conducted in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica.  Water temp
range -1.9C to -1.2C. All failures were due to free flow.

FFM dives were done in Dry Valley lakes.  Water temp 0C.

Based on these tests, USAP now issues Maximus regulators.  As
mentioned earlier, we have had NO failures for past two seasons
having made approximately 2000 dives on the regs during that time.

Hope the information is of value.

Rob Robbins
Scientific Diving Coordinator
US Antarctic Program

Regulator Type          # Dives   # Failures    % Failure

Sherwood Maximus           1341        23           1.7%
Sherwood Blizzard             2         2         100.0%
Poseidon Cyklon 300         710        40           5.6%
Poseidon Odin               270        15           5.6%
US Divers RAM               259        45          17.4%
US Divers Arctic Supreme      7         4          57.1%
US Divers Pro Diver           3         2          66.7%
US Divers Conshelf Supreme    7         4          57.1%
Scubapro Mk10/G200           27        13          48.1%
Scubapro Mk10/D350           17         3          17.6%
Scubapro Mk200/G200           8         8         100.0%
Scubapro Mk10/D400            7         1          14.3%
Scubapro Mk10/Polar           6         2          33.3%
Scubapro Mk10/G250            1         1         100.0%
Dacor Extreme Ice            25         4          16.0%
Mares MR-3                    2         2         100.0%
DSI EXO-26 FFM              106        11          10.4%
AGA FFM                      12         0           0.0%
Totals                     2989       178           6.0%






From: [email addresss deleted] (ROBBINS, ROB) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 11:46 NZD To: [email addresss deleted] Subject: RE: Antarctic Regs :This is impressive. Is there any consensus on why the Maximus performs so :well? Though I have owned one myself, I would have had no specific reason :to guess that the Maximus would be significantly better than any other in :resisting freezing. We think that the Maximus regs do so well because of the heat transfer plates. There are fins that are in the mouth piece tube that transfer heat from your breath to the second stage valve body. There is also a plate in front of the exhaust valve that also preforms this task. These do a lot. It is also very valuable to be able to turn the air control valve down (or even off) to help control any incipient free flow. :My own diving is in water that is rarely colder than 4.0 - 5.0 C. If I were :diving in sub-freezing water, I would consider using a FMM on *every* dive :that did not require a gas switch. We do not use FFMs for the most part because we are diving under a ceiling and must be able to find the 4' diameter hole. If you DO have a problem -and this used to be pretty common- and have to go to the back-up reg, I don't want to lose my vision too. For most of the season here the vis is several hundred feet and we do not use a tether..... Cheers- Rob Robbins Scientific Diving Coordinator US Antarctic Program